A
national animal identification plan is being developed to help protect
American animal agriculture. State animal health officials, livestock industry groups and the federal
government are working together to finalize the plan. They hope to
have Phase One of the plan, Premises ID, in place by July 2004. This phase
would require that standardized premises identification numbers be
established for all production operations, markets, assembly points,
exhibitions and processing plants. Once
the Premises ID systems are in place, the plan will proceed to Phase Two,
which calls for individual identification for cattle in commerce. Other
food animal and livestock species would require all animals that enter
commerce to be identified through individual or group/lot identification.
States, industry and the USDA have been working in partnership on the plan through the National Animal Identification Development Team. The team, which includes a steering committee and five working groups, has produced a draft plan with the working name of the U.S. Animal Identification Plan (USAIP). It carries the tagline “Protecting American Animal Agriculture.” “The
development of a national identification plan has been worked on for
several years, but the recent BSE experience in Canada has reinforced the
need for the U.S. to introduce a national plan as soon as practicably
possible,” said Neil Hammerschmidt, Chief Operating Officer of the Wisconsin
Livestock Identification Consortium
and co-chair of the development team’s steering committee. “A
national plan which IDs all food animals and livestock will allow the U.S.
to identify any animals exposed to disease and will facilitate stopping
the spread of that disease,” said Glenn Slack, president and CEO of the
National Institute for Animal Agriculture (NIAA). “This will help
protect American animal agriculture from the devastating effects that
might occur in the event of a case of BSE, foot and mouth disease or other
deleterious diseases ever being discovered in the U.S.” The draft plan draws on existing voluntary and compulsory animal identification programs currently in place in the U.S. and coordinates these into a truly national program for the first time. Details are still to be finalized, but the development team expects to complete its work within the next 60 days. It is expected that the plan will then be open to review and comment by industry stakeholders. “Maintaining
the health of the U.S. animal herd is the most urgent issue for the
industry and is the focus of the draft plan,” said Hammerschmidt. “The
benefits of a national animal health identification system include
enhanced disease control and eradication capabilities, rapid containment
of foreign animal disease outbreaks and enhanced ability to respond to
threats to biosecurity.” “A
national system would also provide benefits to industry in terms of market
access and consumer demands,” said Slack. “Source and process
verification are gaining consumer momentum, providing producers with an
added value opportunity. Also, livestock and animal products from the U.S.
are highly marketable worldwide. Assuring animal traceability through
animal identification adds value to the product.” “Furthermore,
as more retailers and consumers demand source-verified systems, the
ability of producers to sell their products to these markets might depend
on the ability to trace animals to the farm of origin,” said Slack.
“Other countries have already developed systems that are being used as
technical barriers to trade. These systems are rapidly becoming the world
standard. The U.S needs to be consistent with the animal tracking systems
of its international trading partners to avoid the loss of international
markets.” “As
recently as 1995, nearly nine million calves were identified with orange
brucellosis vaccination ear tags,” said Hammerschmidt. “That number
represented slightly less than one fourth of all the newborn calves or
about 45 percent of all female calves (only females are vaccinated).
Today, fewer than four million calves are vaccinated (10 percent of total
calves, 20 percent of females). The U.S. is very close to declaring itself
free from brucellosis. The level of vaccination will continue to decrease,
if not cease entirely. The identification of calves to the farm of origin
will be minimal in two to three years.”
“Without
identification, our livestock industries would be vulnerable to any
disease situation that required rapid tracking of animal movement,” said
Hammerschmidt. The
draft plan follows 18 months of intensive work by states, industry
and USDA. In early 2002, NIAA’s
Animal Identification and Information System Committee organized an NIAA
task force comprised of approximately 100 representatives of more than 30
stakeholder groups. After months of work, the task force produced the
National Identification Work Plan (NIWP). That plan was presented at the
NIAA ID/INFO EXPO in Chicago in July 2002. The final draft of the NIWP was
then presented to the U.S. Animal Health Association (USAHA) at its annual
meeting in October 2002. The USAHA accepted the plan with a resolution calling for USDA, APHIS, VS, to establish a National Animal Identification Team composed of state, industry and federal partners to further develop a national plan, using the NIWP as a guide." With this charge, APHIS, VS identified key industry leaders to serve as the team’s Steering Committee. These steering committee members then selected members of five working groups, including Communication, Transition, Standards, Governance and Information Technology. An
official Website containing details of the draft plan, background
information, Frequently Asked Questions and Answers about the proposed
plan and provision for comments about the plan is currently under
construction. An announcement as to the Website address will be made
shortly. FOR
MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT: Scott Stuart, USAIP Communication Subcommittee Co-Chair, 719-538-8843, or email at Communication@USAIP.info. Source: USAIP Communication Subcommittee August 6, 2003 |